Medicaid
December 15, 2025
Medicaid Cuts and Anesthesia: Navigating Payment Challenges in 2026

Medicaid Cuts and Anesthesia: Navigating Payment Challenges in 2026

Anesthesia practices in today’s challenging market generate revenue in four broad categories: (a) commercial payors with which they generally have contracts, (b) Medicare plans where the payment rate is determined by Congress, (c) Medicaid where each state determines its own rate and payment methodology, and (d) hospital stipend support, which must be individually negotiated. Historically, commercial rates have been the best. Medicare pays at a significantly discounted rate, but payments are consistent and predictable. Medicaid rates in most states are the most significantly discounted and, as is now becoming evident, can be the most unpredictable. The percentage of practice revenue attributable to Medicaid used to be a given because it was just a small percentage of total practice revenue; but now it is subject to so many diverse factors that it is becoming a new challenge.

Medicaid Cuts and Anesthesia: Navigating Payment Challenges in 2026

Share

Recent Changes

Medicaid policy has been much in the news since the passage of the latest federal budget bill. While the Medicare and Medicaid programs were formed in 1965 as part of President Johnson’s Great Society, the two ended up quite different. As a national healthcare program, Medicare has been known for its consistent national payment and claims adjudication policies. Medicaid, by contrast, represents unique state approaches to providing healthcare to the poor, all of which have resulted in a vast diversity of rates and policies. In California, for example, the program is called Medi-Cal and not Medicaid. As outlined below, new policy provisions will make this diversity even more challenging.

On July 4, 2025, a major budget reconciliation bill was signed into law that significantly reduces federal Medicaid spending. The legislation cuts federal Medicaid expenditures by an estimated $1.035 trillion over ten years—approximately 15%. The largest reductions affect states that adopted the ACA Medicaid expansion, accounting for about $526 billion of the total. As a result, up to 11.8 million enrollees nationwide may lose coverage.

Impact on Payments

Most billing staff will tell you that Medicaid claims are the most difficult to process and collect. There are two primary reasons for this. First, Medicaid programs often have highly specific and plan-dependent submission requirements, requiring claims to be prepared precisely according to each plan’s rules. Second, verifying a patient’s eligibility for the exact date of service requires careful and thorough review of coverage details. There are also unique requirements for sterilization claims with very specific dates and signatures mandated.

In addition, the number of patients covered by Medicaid is expected to decline for several reasons, including changes to state eligibility requirements. This is particularly evident within managed Medicaid plans. The impact of these legislative and administrative adjustments is expected to become more apparent into 2026.

The number of patients covered by Medicaid varies by market (city versus suburb) and by facility type, with most hospital practices historically seeing between 5–15% of their cases with Medicaid plans. Although Medicaid claims are paid at discounted rates, the accounts receivable is booked at gross rates. A meaningful backlog in Medicaid claims can result in a significant increase in the total accounts receivable (AR), when in fact the resolution of the Medicaid AR would not yield such an increase in cash flow. Often a review of AR metrics is skewed by the Medicaid numbers.

The result of all these factors can make it very difficult to assess the true impact of Medicaid on the practice.